Asset-Based Finance: The Next Frontier in Private Credit

Asset-Based Finance: The Next Frontier in Private Credit | HL Hunt
Institutional Outlook

Asset-Based Finance: The Next Frontier in Private Credit

The first act of private credit was lending to companies. The second — unfolding now — is lending against assets: the equipment, receivables, loans, royalties, and infrastructure that generate cash regardless of any single borrower's fortunes. Asset-based finance is the fastest-rising corner of private credit, backed by an ocean of insurance capital and a banking retreat from asset-heavy balance sheets. This is where the market's next trillion is being built.

By the HL Hunt Research Desk · 23 min read · Updated June 2026

The core thesis

Asset-based finance (ABF) represents the maturation of private credit from a corporate-lending story into a structured, collateral-driven one — and it may prove the larger opportunity by far. Where direct lending grew by financing companies, ABF grows by financing assets: pools of loans and receivables whose cash flows repay the debt more or less independently of any borrower's enterprise. This is a subtle but profound shift, because it opens private credit to the vast universe of asset-backed lending that banks have historically dominated — and are now, under capital pressure, vacating.

The central argument here is that ABF is not a niche extension of private credit but potentially its center of gravity. It is drawing the deepest pool of capital in finance — insurance — and targeting the largest addressable market. Understanding ABF is understanding where private credit is actually heading, and where both its greatest promise and its least-tested risks now concentrate.

Private credit's first act financed companies. Its second finances assets — and the addressable market for lending against pools of collateral dwarfs the corporate-loan market that built the industry.

What asset-based finance is

Asset-based finance is lending secured by pools of assets or receivables, where repayment is tied primarily to the performance of the underlying collateral rather than to a single company's overall cash flow. The range of what can be financed is enormous:

  • Consumer receivables — auto loans, credit card balances, and installment loans, including Buy Now, Pay Later.
  • Equipment and leasing — machinery, vehicles, aircraft, and other hard assets.
  • Trade and commercial receivables — invoices and business cash flows.
  • Real-asset and infrastructure cash flows — including the fast-growing data-center and energy segment.
  • Contractual and intangible cash flows — royalties, fund finance, and other structured streams.

In each case, the lender is underwriting the assets and their cash flows, structured with protections, rather than betting on the enterprise value of one operating company.

How it differs from direct lending

Direct lendingAsset-based finance
What's financedCompaniesPools of assets / receivables
Source of repaymentCorporate cash flowUnderlying asset cash flows
Typical structureSenior loan to a firmStructured facility against collateral
DiversificationBorrower-by-borrowerAcross many underlying assets
Capital fitCredit fundsInsurance / long-duration capital

The distinction matters because it changes the risk shape. Direct lending concentrates risk in individual companies; ABF spreads it across pools of assets, which can offer diversification but introduces its own complexity — the performance of the pool, the quality of the structure, and the reliability of the servicing all become central. This is the deeper evolution of the disintermediation story we tell in our private credit outlook.

The three drivers

Three structural forces explain why ABF is expanding faster than almost any other credit strategy.

1. Banks shedding asset-heavy risk

Capital rules make asset-heavy exposures expensive for banks to hold. Increasingly, banks offload the risk on these pools to private lenders — often through significant risk transfer arrangements — while keeping origination and client relationships. This "co-opetition" moves vast quantities of asset-backed risk off bank balance sheets and into private hands, and it is one of the fastest-growing mechanics in the market.

2. Insurance capital seeking matched assets

This is the deepest driver. Insurers and annuity providers hold long-duration liabilities and need long-duration, cash-flowing assets to match them — which is exactly what asset-backed finance produces. The result is a structural marriage: permanent insurance capital flowing into ABF, providing a stable, enormous funding base that reduces the industry's reliance on traditional fund investors.

3. A vast addressable market

The runway is the headline. Analysts estimate the addressable market for private credit — with ABF, infrastructure, residential mortgages, and commercial real estate among the segments most likely to migrate from bank balance sheets — exceeds $30 trillion. ABF fundraising has scaled rapidly, and the strategy is widely expected to challenge, or even overtake, direct lending as the largest part of private credit over time.

$30T+ addressable
Estimated addressable market for private credit, with asset-based finance, infrastructure, mortgages, and commercial real estate among the exposures most likely to shift from banks to non-bank lenders. (McKinsey and industry estimates)

The AI-infrastructure engine

One asset class deserves singling out, because it has become both a powerful growth engine and a concentration risk: the financing of the AI build-out. The capital needs of data centers, power generation, and fiber are staggering, and private markets are stepping in at scale — one estimate suggests private credit could supply more than half of the roughly $1.5 trillion needed for global data-center construction through 2028, and individual deals have reached remarkable size, such as a reported $29 billion private financing for a single data-center project.

This is ABF at its most consequential. Infrastructure credit tied to the AI boom offers long-duration, contracted cash flows that suit insurance capital beautifully — and simultaneously concentrates an enormous amount of the market's recent growth in a single, thesis-dependent bet. If the AI-infrastructure demand curve holds, it is a generational opportunity; if it disappoints, it is a concentrated exposure. Both things are true at once, which is precisely why it warrants attention rather than reflexive enthusiasm.

The bull case

The constructive argument for ABF is genuinely strong. It offers diversification away from corporate credit, spreading risk across pools of many underlying assets rather than concentrating it in individual firms. It is often secured by hard or contractual collateral, which can improve recovery in stress. It matches insurance liabilities, creating a stable and structurally motivated capital base. And it addresses a market so large that even substantial growth leaves ample runway. For allocators seeking to broaden beyond a crowded, spread-compressed direct-lending market, ABF's diversity and scale are a legitimate and compelling draw.

The risks

Intellectual honesty requires weighing the other side with equal seriousness.

  • Consumer credit exposure. Some ABF pools are backed by consumer debt — including the very BNPL receivables whose reporting gaps we examine in the phantom-debt problem. If the underlying borrowers' true leverage is hard to see, the risk in the structures built on them is correspondingly hard to price.
  • Concentration. The heavy tilt toward AI-infrastructure financing concentrates growth in one thesis, as discussed above.
  • Complexity and opacity. Structured, layered facilities are harder to value and analyze than a simple corporate loan, and opacity is the vulnerability that tends to matter most in a downturn.
  • Insurance-capital feedback. The reliance on insurance capital ties the fate of ABF to the health of insurers holding illiquid private assets — a linkage drawing growing regulatory scrutiny.
  • An untested cycle. Like private credit broadly, much of ABF has scaled in a benign environment and has not been fully tested through a downturn at its current size.

The outlook

The measured conclusion is that asset-based finance is likely to be one of the defining growth stories in credit over the coming years — plausibly rivaling or surpassing direct lending — carried by the structural marriage of insurance capital and bank risk transfer, and by a genuinely vast addressable market. That trajectory looks durable. But its quality will be decided by the same discipline that governs all credit: the rigor of underwriting the underlying assets, the soundness of the structures, and the honesty of valuation when the cycle turns. The concentration in AI infrastructure and the exposure to opaque consumer debt are the two places to watch most closely.

For the broader financial system, ABF's rise continues the great migration of credit off bank balance sheets and into private, insurance-backed hands — reshaping not just who lends, but how risk is structured and held. It connects directly to the consumer-credit dynamics we track in the credit cycle, because the assets being financed are, ultimately, the debts of American households and businesses. As ever in credit, the winners will be those who can see the underlying assets clearly — and price honestly what they see.

Frequently asked questions

What is asset-based finance?

Lending secured by pools of assets or receivables — equipment leases, auto loans, consumer loans, trade receivables, royalties, mortgages, infrastructure cash flows — rather than a single company's overall cash flow. It's a fast-growing segment of private credit, distinct from corporate direct lending, where repayment tracks the underlying assets.

How is asset-based finance different from direct lending?

Direct lending makes cash-flow loans to companies, typically senior loans to mid-market firms. ABF lends against specific pools of assets and their cash flows, so the collateral — not the borrower's overall business — is the primary source of repayment. ABF spans a broader, more diversified set of exposures and often moves asset-heavy risk off bank balance sheets.

Why is asset-based finance growing so fast?

Banks are shedding asset-heavy exposures under capital rules, often via significant risk transfer; insurance and annuity capital seeks long-duration, cash-flowing assets that match its liabilities; and the AI and infrastructure build-out needs enormous financing. Estimates put the addressable market for private credit, including ABF, above $30 trillion.

What are the risks of asset-based finance?

Exposure to consumer credit quality in some pools, concentration in fast-growing sectors like AI infrastructure, the complexity and opacity of layered structures, and reliance on insurance capital that draws regulatory scrutiny. Like private credit broadly, much of ABF has grown in a benign period and isn't fully cycle-tested at its current scale.

Key takeaways

  • ABF lends against pools of assets, not corporate cash flow — private credit's fastest-rising strategy.
  • It's driven by banks shedding asset risk, insurance capital seeking matched assets, and a $30T+ market.
  • AI-infrastructure financing is a huge growth engine and a concentration risk at once.
  • The bull case is diversification, collateral, and scale; the bear case is consumer exposure and opacity.
  • ABF may rival or overtake direct lending — underwriting the underlying assets is what will separate winners.

This report is for general information only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Market figures are drawn from publicly reported estimates, which vary by source and methodology and change over time.